Your AI agent is confidently wrong about your data. Sigil fixes that.
Same question. Different answers. Every time.
Your AI agent queries your tools correctly. It returns valid data. But it gives your VP Sales one pipeline number and your CFO another because it doesn't know what your metrics actually mean in your business. That gap costs you in board meetings, forecasts, and trust.
Where does it hurt?
Your VP Sales and CFO see different pipeline numbers
Metric definitions, exclusion rules, and field aliases. The context that makes AI agents accurate on revenue questions. Built by a RevOps practitioner running 1,470 HubSpot properties daily.
See RevOps use cases →80% of your time on ad-hoc questions that AI could answer, if it had context
Table schemas, join logic, metric formulas, and known gotchas. Structured context that takes text-to-SQL from 21% to 98%+ accuracy. Works with BigQuery, Snowflake, Postgres, and 6 more.
See data & analytics use cases →Three steps to accurate answers
Connect
Add Sigil to Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor. One line. Runs alongside your existing data connections and doesn't replace anything.
Define
Sigil asks the questions your new hire would ask: “What counts as a qualified deal?” “Which pipeline is the real one?” “Do we include partner deals in win rate?” Your answers become the agent's permanent context.
Trust
Every agent in your org now queries through your definitions. The right filters. The right properties. The right exclusions. Your VP Sales and your CFO see the same number.
Works with any tool your AI agent connects to.
“Most AI tools have access to data. What they don't have is context.”
HubSpot CPO, Spring 2026
“60% of agentic analytics projects relying solely on MCP will fail by 2028 without a semantic layer.”
Gartner D&A Summit, 2026
Same question. Same answer. Every time.
No more triple-checking. No more “where did you get that number?” Free to start.